Tag Archives: reform

health

Concern About Health Care Reform Makes Top News

Despite Republican opposition, this was the day that The US Senate, along with the US House of Representatives opted to pass the much-needed health care reform legislation.

Health Reform.gov is the official lookout point for those concerned about health reform news.  According to them, this is what President Obama had to say about the Senate’s passing of the Health Care bill:  ”With passage of reform bills in both the House and the Senate, we are now finally poised to deliver on the promise of real, meaningful health-insurance reform that will bring additional security and stability to the American people.”

(See HealthReform.gov)

Concerned Americans And Health Care Reform Topics

Countless concerned Americans across the nation, who followed health care reform topics this year can breath a sigh of relief.  The final resolution of this important issue is upon us and other areas of concern can resume dominating our lives.  This year, top news centered on headlines like:  10 Health Care Reform Myths (CBS News), Man’s Finger Bitten Off in Scuffle at Health Care Rally (KTLA), The Top 5 Lies About Obama’s Health Care Reform (Newsweek.com), and Health Care Reform: Taxes may Hit Middle-Class (ABC News).   Whether for or against the needed health care reform, many Americans followed the topics religiously.

On the other hand, there were previously, and probably still are, a number of individuals who don’t comprehend what the lack of adequate health care would ultimately lead to.  These apathetic Americans are not concerned about the limitations and suffering of others, as long as they have health care coverage for their selves and their own family.

The Reality Of Inadequate Health Care Coverage

There are actually people who don’t know what the reality of inadequate health care coverage really means. Having a great health insurance plan at work may be the reason some people don’t worry about health care coverage, but what happens if you end up like one out of work supervisor who previously was employed by Ford Motor Company? In his recent article: Waiting for Reform: The Unemployed Get A Health Care COBRA Gift, writer Kevin O’Leary discusses the extended funds that were made available as a result of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Concerning the extension of funds to unemployed individuals, O’Leary quoted the out-of-work supervisor as saying:  “When you have to draw straws between paying the utility bills, the mortgage and health care, it’s hard.”  (News.Yahoo.com)

Personal stories like this one helps to emphasize why the recent passing of health care reform legislation was so crucial.  This goes hand in hand with the opinions of people like Terry Lynch.  In a December 26, 2009 article in the Meridian Star, Lynch wrote about personal family experiences with the issue of inadequate health care.  According to Lynch:  “The result was loss of our home, everything my parents had worked and fought to secure for their family, and the destruction of my family.”  (MeridianStar.com)

Why Americans Need The New Health Care Reform

There are a multitude of reasons why Americans need the new health care reform legislation that was just passed.  It involves more than just the ability to see a doctor when you or your loved ones are sick or going to the hospital if you’re seriously ill.  Health care reform also involves:

Regular Health Checkups for Children and Seniors
Regular Dental Visits for Children and Seniors
Prenatal Care
Preventive Testing & Screening For Communicable Diseases (TB , Hepatitis, etc)
Preventive Testing & Screening For Sexually Transmitted Diseases (AIDS, Herpes, etc.)
Mental Health Screening

Those who manage to remain apathetic to health care reform news and related issues mistakenly believe they are not affected.  Think about what would happen if the six points mentioned above were left unchecked, and no decision was ever made about how to fund these critical health areas.  More than the individuals who are directly involved would be affected.  It could easily become not just an American problem, but a global one! This is why Democratic senator Herb Kohl from Wisconsin was able to vote in favor of the new health care reform bill.  He likened the passing of this historic legislation to the  Social Security legislation in 1935, and Medicare later on in 1965.  Just as the echoes of those in opposition became faint and drowned out, so too those who have opposed health care reform.  Kohl stated:  “By insuring 95 percent of Americans while reducing the deficit, this legislation achieves what many thought was impossible, and I am proud to have been able to cast my vote in favor of it.”

Every Person Deserves Decent Health Care

No matter who or where we are, every person deserves decent health care.  This is something that most honest-hearted Americans would readily admit.  Some who oppose President Obama’s Plan have not made it their business to visit Organizing for America, the official site that gives the hard cold facts about the plan.  I recommend going to the website and reading for yourself what the new health plan does and does not include.  This will help to dispel any rumors you may have heard, and give you a clear understanding of what the plan is, and why it is. (Organizing for America)

In a nutshell:

“It will provide more security and stability to those who have health insurance.  It will provide insurance to those who don’t.  And it will lower the cost of health care for our families, our businesses and our government.”  President Barack Obama

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Writers: Read About the Writer’s Research Network (WRN)

Written by charmbaker
Los Angeles based web content and article writer who enjoys covering health, travel and other topics especially for small business owners.

health

Health Insurance Reform Weekly Medical cost trends for 2012

PricewaterhouseCoopers and Medco Health Solutions released two new views of cost trends in health care during the past week, building on the release of the Milliman Medical Index.   PwC Health Research Institute’s “Behind the numbers: Medical cost trends for 2012,” examines the medical cost trends for employers in 2012.  This new report found “Medical cost trend is expected to increase from 8 percent in 2011 to 8.5 percent in 2012.”  And two main drivers identified by PwC are provider consolidation and cost-shifting to the private sector.

Providing a view of prescription drug utilization and pricing trends, Medco’s Annual Drug Trend Report showed this week that while the overall growth of prescription drug prices is at an historic low (as a result of increased use of generic drugs), the cost of specialty treatments is still increasing at an alarming rate.  According to Medco’s report “Specialty drug trend was 17.4 percent in 2010, fueled by unit cost growth of 11.5 percent.”

Federal

There is no Federal report for this week.

States

ARIZONA: The Department of Insurance (DOI) held a public hearing on rate review as part of its Health and Human Services (HHS) grant activities. The DOI has retained Mercer Consulting to assist in performing a gap analysis to identify areas that need to be addressed in order to comply with the requirements of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). During the hearing, it was noted that the state’s current statutory scheme does not authorize the DOI to review a health insurer’s medical loss ratio, potentially not allowing the state to meet the HHS requirement of having “an effective rate review process.”

The Director of Insurance and the Governor’s office also hosted their first workgroup on the implementation of an exchange. Despite the legislature’s refusal to pass an exchange bill, there is concern at the executive level about a lack of preparedness in the event the ACA is not repealed or found unconstitutional. This week’s topic was the qualified health plan certification, and participants focused on not adding requirements beyond the ACA minimum benefit requirements.

CALIFORNIA: The Appropriations committees of both houses are wading through many bills that would have varying impacts on state finances.  Bills meeting certain dollar thresholds are sent to “suspense” filing for consideration at later hearings.  Most of the legislation that Aetna and other allies have opposed has been sent to the “suspense” filing, including a bill on rate regulation and all bills on benefit mandates, because of the fiscal impact of each bill and potential conflicts with federal guidance on essential benefits. These bills may be revived at a later date, or they may be held by the committees.  We expect the majority of the bills to be voted off the suspense file by the end of the month, including.

Rate regulation – According to Appropriations, there would be an annual fee-supported special fund cost of at least million to DMHC and CDI.
Rate regulation – According to Appropriations, there would be an annual fee-supported special fund cost of at least million to DMHC and CDI.
Autism mandate – According to the committee analysis, this bill would result in annual costs to the following state entities:
CalPERS: million
Medi-Cal, for enrollees in managed care plans: 4 million
MRMIB plans (Healthy Families, AIM, MRMIP): million

In state budget news, the governor will release his May revision to the state budget next week, taking into account new revenue figures that show the state taking in more than billion in unanticipated new tax dollars. The governor still believes that asking voters to extend the higher tax rates set to expire this summer is the right thing to do because the higher revenue forecasts would not close the entire budget shortfall.  Republicans, however, have been quick to argue that higher revenue forecasts mean that extending tax rates is not needed at this time.

CONNECTICUT: The legislative session adjourns June 8, but the legislature has yet to reach a conclusion on several major issues, including an exchange bill, a rate review bill and the SustiNet bill.  Although the SustiNet compromise bill language is not public, the Administration and press reports have said that the bill does not include a public option but would create an advisory board on health reform implementation and examination of future state reforms. In addition, an anti-most favored nation clause bill has passed the House and now goes to the Senate for its consideration. Aetna supported the bill with amendments. The bill is expected to pass. Additionally, the recently released HHS rate review rule may push legislators to advocate for adoption of the federal 10 percent trigger for rate review in Connecticut, just in case the federal law is repealed.

DELAWARE: The Department of Insurance (DOI) submitted a medical loss ratio (MLR) waiver application to HHS for its individual health insurance market. The DOI-requested adjustment proposes a three-year phase-in of the MLR as follows: 65 percent for 2011, 70 percent for 2012, and 75 percent for 2013.

GEORGIA:  Governor Deal has signed legislation that applies state prompt-pay standards to self-funded plans.  Aetna will be working with self-funded customers who have questions about the validity of the new law and its application to their plans, which are generally covered by ERISA.

INDIANA: Insurance Commissioner Stephen Robertson submitted an MLR waiver request to HHS seeking relief from the MLR regulation for the individual market and for consumer-directed health plans in both the individual and small group markets.  Specifically, for the individual market, Indiana is requesting that the MLR be waived for the individual market through 2014, or, as an alternative, that it be phased in as follows: 65 percent in 2011, 68.75 percent in 2012, 72.5 percent in 2013, 76.25 percent in 2014, and 80 percent in 2015, with an exemption from the MLR requirement until 2014 for new market entrants (defined as those that have not previously sold individual major medical health insurance products in Indiana for the previous 10-year period). For consumer-directed health plans in the individual and small group markets, Indiana is requesting a permanent waiver from the federal MLR requirements.

MAINE: Governor LePage has signed into law an Act to Modify Rating Practices for Individual and Small Group Health Plans. The new law is designed to open up Maine’s individual and small-group insurance market to competition. It also is supposed to:

help lower health insurance premiums by broadening Maine’s community rating system and allowing insurance companies to base their premiums on a more flexible set of criteria.
allow Maine residents to purchase insurance in four New England states beginning in 2014.
set up a reinsurance pool to cover individuals with serious illnesses. The pool would be subsidized by a covered lives assessment capped at per member per month.

The Maine People’s Alliance (a progressive advocacy group), the Maine Democratic Party, and others are looking into the feasibility of initiating a referendum on the new law. In order to get a referendum on the November ballot, opponents would have to file approximately 60,000 signatures with the secretary of state no later than 90 days after the enactment of the bill on May 17, 2011.

MONTANA: Governor Brian Schweitzer has decided to reconsider his amendatory veto of legislation that prohibits the state from enforcing the individual responsibility requirement contained in the ACA.  Noting the critical role that the individual mandate plays in lowering the cost of coverage, the Governor’s amendatory veto argued that the prohibition against enforcing the mandate in Montana should be contingent on whether residents have access to affordable coverage.  However, on May 13, the Governor reversed his position and signed the bill into law, as permitted under Montana’s statutory procedural guidelines.  The provisions of the law include legislative findings stating that the ACA individual coverage requirement will cause unnecessary expense and inconvenience to individuals and employers, and therefore the legislature prohibits any agency of the state from enforcing the provisions of the ACA and subsequent federal regulations that relate to the individual coverage requirement. The law specifies that the prohibition extends to requiring public employees to purchase or maintain coverage and state officials or employees from participating in boards, commissions, or entities of the NAIC that are assigned to recommend provisions that implement the individual mandate.

NEVADA: HHS informed the Nevada Division of Insurance that the state’s application for a transitional waiver from the MLR provisions contained in the ACA has been denied and amended.

In its response letter, HHS admits that application of the ACA MLR standard could in fact lead to destabilization of the state’s individual market but argues that the transitional waiver requested by the state (72 percent) exceeds the amount necessary to prevent destabilization and would ‘deny consumers an excessive amount of benefit.’  For this reason, HHS determined that Nevada should be granted a one-year transitional waiver under which the MLR for the state’s individual market will be 75 percent in 2011.

SB 440, which would create the Silver State Exchange, had its first hearing on March 18 in the Finance Committee, but no action to advance the measure was taken.

NEW JERSEY: Last week the Department of Banking and Insurance (DOBI) announced that Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey has officially withdrawn its application to convert to a for-profit entity.

In the final round of public budget hearings, the non-partisan Office of Legislative Services (OLS) and State Treasurer, Andrew Sidamon-Eristoff, testified that state revenue is now expected to exceed forecast by 0 to 0 million due to higher income tax collection. This was welcome news as the legislature and the Christie Administration wrestle with various program cuts under the current budget proposal. Leadership in the legislature has called for restoration of property tax rebates and reconsideration of the proposed changes to the Medicaid program.  It has been reported the Administration is seeking to change Medicaid eligibility to 33 percent of the federal poverty level. Democratic legislators have come out en masse opposing this change.

NEW YORK:  James Wrynn will be the deputy superintendent for Insurance under the Department of Financial Services (DFS) after the consolidation of the New York State Insurance Department, of which he is currently superintendent, with the Banking Department. Benjamin Lawsky was nominated to be the superintendent of the DFS. At packed confirmation hearings, Lawsky appeared before the Senate Insurance Committee and then the Senate Banking Committee. Lawsky said he understands that prior approval has become “overly politicized.”  He said he would make addressing this his “number one priority.” He also said he planned to meet with all stakeholders on this issue in the coming months. He was unanimously approved by both Insurance and Banking Committees but must still appear before the Senate Finance Committee for its approval.

The NYS Department of Insurance held public hearings on exchanges that reports say were not well attended. The New York Health Plan Association testified that the success of any health insurance exchange boils down to the affordability of coverage it can offer.  The HPA said the best way to preserve affordability is through an independent authority, which could be created by passing very limited exchange legislation before the end of the legislative session. Such legislation could establish the governance and infrastructure of the exchange and charge it with conducting research to make recommendations regarding the policy issues that need to be addressed by 2014. A key issue to address is how to ensure that the exchange is financially sustainable by 2015, as the law requires.

NORTH CAROLINA: Legislation implementing an Exchange Advisory Board met with some consumer opposition last week.  Opposition centered mostly on the way in which the exchange will be funded.

OKLAHOMA:  In the final week of the legislative session, leadership in both chambers announced the formation of a special joint legislative committee to study how the new federal health care law affects Oklahoma. Senate Pro Tem Brian Bingman and House Speaker Kris Steele ordered the formation of the joint committee and announced that “studying this issue in more depth makes for healthy legislative process. The scope of this law is vast, so we need to make sure we are prepared to address this law in a conservative way that is best for Oklahoma.” The committee will have bipartisan membership. The joint committee will hold a series of public meetings over the legislative interim focusing on how the ACA affects Oklahoma. The committee will also explore how to best approach the law as the state awaits the outcome of its lawsuit challenging the law’s constitutionality. The committee will then make recommendations on how the state should address the federal health care law.

As a result, legislation that would create an Oklahoma health insurance exchange will not be heard this year.

TEXAS: The health care collaboratives that would be set up by pending legislation (Senate Bill 8) authored by Senate Health and Human Services Chair Jane Nelson are intended to promote higher quality of care at lower cost. The collaboratives would allow groups of providers, such as hospitals and doctors, to bargain collectively with the people who pay them. The goal is to give providers more leverage in price negotiations with an eye to cutting overall health care costs. But staff at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) say giving these collaboratives antitrust protection could have the opposite effect and could harm consumers. Staffers have flagged this key provision of the Lieutenant Governor’s health care agenda for the session, indicating that a tool intended to improve the efficiency and quality of care in Texas might in actuality “lead to dramatically increased costs and decreased access to health care for Texas consumers.” To get around any antitrust issues, SB 8 specifically gives collaboratives exemption from antitrust laws. The bill is in the final stages of passage and could be headed to the House floor at some point in the last 10 days of the legislative session.

Meanwhile, uncertainty hung over the Texas Capitol at the end of last week as budget negotiators worked to bridge the gulf between the House and Senate spending plans and avert a special legislative session. What had been a billion difference Wednesday was narrowed to a few hundred million dollars as the House agreed to the Senate’s proposal on public education. To help pay for the billion added into the budget, the House relies on the .2 billion of additional state revenue announced by Comptroller Susan Combs this week. Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst said he was optimistic that a deal was in the offing. Negotiators are taking it down to the wire trying to complete their work by the end of the legislative session on May 30.

WISCONSIN: The Wisconsin Office of Free Market Health Care’s (OFMHC) survey to gather stakeholder input on the design of a potential Wisconsin Health Insurance Exchange closed last week.  Now, the OFMHC will develop its plan for the exchange.  OFMHC has been tasked to design and implement a Wisconsin Health Insurance Exchange that utilizes a free-market, consumer driven approach.

health

Health Insurance Quotes Reform Weekly January

Federal

Although the House vote to repeal health care reform is symbolic only (given the Democratic Senate and White House), it is a necessary first step leading to committee by committee action over the coming months on discrete provisions of health care. One such item, medical malpractice liability reform, got a hearing last week before the House Judiciary Committee as Republicans paraded several witnesses before the committee to showcase the need for legislation from the physicians’ perspective. Since it is very unlikely that the American Medical Association’s wish list would ever become law, the best result from the committee process would be a bill that skirts the more controversial items (e.g., cap on damages) and focuses on attainable and meaningful reforms, such as health courts, stronger pre-trial evaluation and settlement pathways.  This would be a path Aetna would strongly support.

States

ARIZONA: Governor Jan Brewer has announced that she will request a waiver from the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services so that the state can set Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) eligibility below levels mandated by the PPACA. In March 2010, Governor Brewer signed a fiscal year 2011 budget that stripped funding for the state’s Children’s Health Insurance program (KidsCare) and cut 5 million from AHCCCS, effectively repealing an expansion of AHCCCS to childless adults approved by voters in 2000. However, following enactment of the PPACA, the state rescinded the scheduled cuts to comply with the law’s “maintenance of efforts” (MOE) requirement. The MOE requirement prohibits a state from having eligibility standards, methodologies, or procedures for adults that are more restrictive than those in effect on March 23, 2010, until a health insurance exchange in the state is fully operational, and for all children in Medicaid and CHIP through September 30, 2019. The MOE requirement provides an exception for non-pregnant, non-disabled adults earning more than 133 percent of the federal poverty level if a state is projected to have a budget deficit. Arizona faces a mid-year budget deficit estimated at 5 million. A .4 billion shortfall is projected for the 2012 fiscal year.

CALIFORNIA: The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review whether health care providers and patients have the right to sue California over budget reductions made to Medi-Cal reimbursements. The high court will review three legal challenges to California’s proposed and adopted reimbursement cuts. The Supreme Court’s ruling on the case could have major implications for efforts to address California’s budget deficit. Last week, Gov. Jerry Brown (D) released a budget proposal that would reduce Medi-Cal payments to health care providers by 10 percent to cut program spending by about 9 million in fiscal year 2011-2012. In addition, the case could have implications for other states seeking to address budget deficits by cutting Medicaid payments. With federal courts in California blocking the cuts, 22 states have joined California in appealing the issue to the Supreme Court.  The court is expected to hear oral arguments in the case next fall. A decision is expected in late 2011 or early 2012.

CONNECTICUT: Speaker Chris Donovan, members of the Public Health and Insurance Committees and a variety of advocates held a press conference last week to announce the Public Health Committee has raised the SustiNet bill based on the recent recommendations of the SustiNet Board. Few details were provided, but the original report recommends that SustiNet become a licensed insurance plan. ”We don’t need health insurance anymore, we need to move towards health assurance — health care that will be there for us, and the SustiNet plan will do that,” Donovan said. Lawmakers will face a .7 billion budget deficit by July 1. Rep. Betsy Ritter, D-Waterford, co-chairwoman of the Public Health Committee, said the plan will have to go before multiple legislative committees, with the actual bill some weeks away. A financial analysis on upfront costs is not yet available. Aetna is working with the Connecticut Association of Health Plans (CTAHP) and AHIP to secure an objective fiscal analysis of SustiNet’s, as a public option, true cost to the state, and of the strong, positive impact health insurers have on the state’s economy.

DELAWARE: In his State of the State speech, Governor Jack Markell emphasized the need for state government to spend more efficiently.  He specifically noted that the demands state employee health insurance and pensions are putting on the state budget are unsustainable. The Governor specifically stated he is open to any and all good ideas for addressing this budget issue. In other news, a joint meeting of the Senate Health Committee and the House Economic Development, Banking, Insurance, and Commerce  Committee was convened for an update on the state’s effort to implement health care reform. Rita Landgraf, Secretary of Health and Social Services, along with Bettina Riveros, Health Care Commission Chair, advised legislators the commission will spend the next six to eight weeks holding stakeholder meetings across the state seeking input on establishing a state health insurance exchange.

GEORGIAThe Exchange Workgroup formed by former Governor Sonny Perdue had its final meeting last week and will submit a list of issues for Governor Deal’s administration to review before deciding how to proceed on the issue of instituting an exchange in Georgia. As the head of this workgroup for Governor Perdue is continuing under Governor Deal’s administration, it is likely that there will be some enabling legislation during the 2011 session, though it is unclear what that will be. The legislative session began January 11, 2011 and continues for 40 legislative days.

IOWA: The General Assembly convened in Des Moines on January 10 and is expected to adjourn on April 29, 2011  In the November elections, Republicans took control of the House and gained a few seats in the Senate, narrowing the Democrats’ majority there. Republican Terry Branstad was sworn in as governor for the second time. Having served in the post from 1983 to 1999, Branstad is the longest-serving governor in Iowa’s history. The state’s budget deficit is projected to be more than 5 million for fiscal year 2012 and will dominate legislative discussions. House Speaker Kraig Paulsen has vowed to remedy the deficit through spending cuts rather than tax increases. The Governor’s proposal to revise the state’s annual budget to a two-year cycle will also be debated. Bills of interest so far include several challenging PPACA’s individual mandate, a prohibition on abortion coverage, creation of mandate-lite policies, a mandate for coverage of smoking cessation programs, a rate review bill that would require a public hearing for any increase over 10 percent in the individual market, and a bill establishing 0 as the minimum required payment for state employees.

INDIANA: Governor Mitch Daniels has issued an executive order  establishing the Indiana Health Benefit Exchange. In his order he directs the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration (IFSSA) to cooperate with appropriate state agencies, including the Department of Insurance (IDOI), to establish and operate the exchange. The IFSSA Secretary or the secretary’s designee will serve as the incorporator of the Exchange. If, after careful analysis, the state deems it appropriate to proceed with creation of the exchange, a board of directors will be selected. The board will include representatives of state agencies and the Indiana General Assembly. Standing Committees will be appointed that have stakeholder representation. In addition, Governor Daniels submitted a letter to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius requesting approval of a state plan amendment to extend the Healthy Indiana Program (HIP) beyond its expiration date. HIP, the state’s consumer-directed program for covering the uninsured population, is scheduled to expire in 2012. Daniels notes he has received communication from HHS staff indicating the state plan amendment will be rejected due to HIP’s required level of contribution from participants.  The Governor said the state intends to utilize the program for the newly eligible Medicaid population pursuant to PPACA. Daniels cautioned that Indiana does not have the time and financial resources necessary to complete new rigorous requirements for applying for a waiver extension if the amendment is rejected. The current 45,000 enrollees in the program would have to be transitioned into traditional Medicaid.

MISSOURI: The 96th General Assembly convened on January 5 and is expected to adjourn on May 30, 2011. With 106 members to the Democrats’ 57, the GOP has the largest number of seats it has ever held in the House and is just three members short of being veto-proof.  Given the large Republican majorities in the General Assembly and 70 percent voter support for Proposition C – an effort to turn back health care reform, the legislature will be under pressure to do nothing to move Missouri closer to enactment of federal health reform.

Significant health care bills filed this session include a resolution calling on the Attorney General to file a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the PPACA, a bill requiring statutory authorization by the General Assembly to implement PPACA, a bill expanding the autism mandate, an MLR bill for large carriers requiring a 90 percent MLR for Missouri-associated revenues and 85 percent for smaller carriers, a bill requiring the state employee health plan to offer a minimum of three high-deductible options with differing annual deductibles and annual out-of-pocket expenses, a bill prohibiting “Most Favored Nation” clauses, legislation creating transparency and publication of carriers’ fee schedules and requiring carriers to contract with providers willing to meet certain provider participation terms and conditions, and creation of a uniform group application for insurance.

NEBRASKA: The 102nd unicameral legislature has convened in Lincoln where it is expected to spend much of the session grappling with a budget deficit approaching 5 million for the 2011-2013 biennium. Implementation of the PPACA is expected to receive serious attention as well, with six bills relating to implementation or rejection of PPACA introduced to date. Bills of interest include legislation creating an Exchange Task Force, an interim committee for PPACA study, and several bills challenging the individual mandate, prohibition of abortion coverage, and a cochlear implant mandate. In addition, a bill banning discretionary clauses in health and disability income insurance contracts has been introduced.  The legislature began its work on January 6 and is tentatively scheduled to adjourn on May 26, 2011.

NEW HAMPSHIRE: The legislature convened on January 5, 2011, and is scheduled to adjourn on June 30, 2011. Governor John Lynch will continue as the state Executive; however, Republicans have gained control of both chambers in the legislature. In addition to the state’s budget deficit, implementation of federal health care reform will continue to be a priority for the governor and the legislature. Given the Republican majority and anticipated revenue shortfalls, there will be limited, if any, activity on health insurance issues. The legislature will, however, be paying close attention to federal health reform implementation issues and activities. In addition, there have been discussions about eliminating certain state mandates if they are not included in the essential benefits required under the PPACA. In 2010, the state enacted legislation granting certain powers to the commissioner with respect to implementation of PPACA.  This legislation also created a legislative oversight committee, to which the Department of Insurance (DOI) must report monthly. This month the DOI submitted a request for a waiver of the 80 percent minimum loss ratio (MLR) requirement for individual health insurance market policies until 2014.

NEW YORK: In a new report, the United Hospital Fund (UHF) looks at how New York might set up health insurance exchanges. One option is to let HHS run the state’s exchange, While that could save money, it would also mean ceding key operational and regulatory issues to the feds. It might also jeopardize existing consumer protections in Medicaid that are unique to New York. If the state sets up its own exchange, it must decide whether to join a multi-state exchange, a statewide entity, or small local ones. UHF noted that New York might consider following the leads of Massachusetts and California by creating an independent public authority to run an exchange. Former Governor David Paterson created a 35-member Exchange Committee that met only twice and did not make any recommendations. Governor Andrew Cuomo has not indicated his plans for establishing an insurance exchange in New York.

PENNSYLVANIA: Governor Tom Corbett has announced his intention to nominate Michael Consedine as the next Insurance Commissioner. Consedine is a partner at the law firm of Saul Ewing, where he serves as Vice Chair of its Insurance Practice Group.  Prior to joining Saul Ewing 12 years ago, Consedine served as state Insurance Department Counsel.

The Corbett transition team has announced that adultBasic, Pennsylvania’s health insurance program for low-income adults, is expected to expire on February 28 due to lack of funding.  The announcement, unusual in that it comes from an incoming  administration, was necessitated by the need to provide advance notice to enrollees and to inform them of alternative coverage options. Originally started by former Governor Tom Ridge and funded through the state’s allocation of Tobacco Settlement dollars, the program was later funded through the 2005 Community Health Reinvestment Agreement (CHRA).  While that agreement between the Rendell Administration and the state’s four Blue Cross plans expired on Dec. 31, 2010, additional funding was later provided by the plans pursuant to the CHRA’s formula.  It now appears those additional funds will be exhausted by the end of next month.

TENNESSEEA new Commissioner of Insurance appointed by Governor Bill Haslam took office last week. Julie McPeak is an attorney at the Nashville firm of Burr and Forman and the former Commissioner of Insurance in Kentucky.  Aetna is scheduling a meeting with the new Commissioner within the next several weeks.

health

Health Insurance Reform Issues Student Health Insurance

Health Insurance Reform Issues Student Health Insurance

Free Online Articles Directory

Why Submit Articles?
Top Authors
Top Articles
FAQ
ABAnswers

Publish Article

0 && $ .browser.msie ) {
var ie_version = parseInt($ .browser.version);
if(ie_version Login

Login via

Register
Hello
My Home
Sign Out

Email

Password


Remember me?
Lost Password?

Home Page > Finance > Insurance > Health Insurance Reform Issues Student Health Insurance

Categories
AdvertisingArts & EntertainmentAutomotiveBeautyBusinessCareersComputersEducationFinanceFood and BeverageHealthHobbiesHome and FamilyHome ImprovementInternetLawMarketingNews and SocietyRelationshipsSelf ImprovementShoppingSpiritualitySports and FitnessTechnologyTravelWriting

Health Insurance Reform Issues Student Health Insurance

By: Health Insurance
Posted: Mar 17, 2011

With a law as complex as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), unintended consequences are always a concern. Last week The Wall Street Journal reported that the physician community is witnessing the emergence of a significant unintended consequence — since tax-advantaged flexible spending accounts can no longer be used to pay for over-the-counter medications without a prescription, under the law, many patients are now visiting their doctors expressly for the purpose of getting new prescriptions for the OTC medications. The change in the law was meant to discourage wasteful spending on some health products and raise revenue. Instead, critics say the provision is driving up health care costs. Unintended consequences of the health care reform law is an area of focus for Aetna insurance, and will continue to urge flexibility in the implementation process to help address potential unintended consequences.

Federal
In response to various requests for clarification (including from Aetna insurance), federal regulators last week issued a Question & Answer document that further refines the previous proposed rule on student health. In short, this clarification makes it clear that nothing from PPACA applies to student health plans until policy years beginning in 2012 or until academic year 2012-2013. The Q & A also clarified that the proposed regulation must be finalized to show what parts of the PPACA would apply to student health plans. This is welcome news in the college and university community. Aetna is communicating with its clients in a manner that is consistent with last week’s clarification, though many schools were hearing conflicting advice from state regulators.

The House-passed continuing resolution includes language that would “prohibit the use of funds to pay any employee, officer, contractor, or grantee of any department or agency to implement the provisions” of the PPACA. In a letter to Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius made several claims that, should the de-funding provisions in the resolution be enacted into law, seniors will lose access to Medicare Advantage plans and other services. Senate Republicans were quick to dispute these allegations stating, the scenarios the Secretary envisions are not allowed under Congressional rules, are not assumed by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), and can be prevented by HHS.  Senator Orrin Hatch and Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp also sent Secretary Sebelius a letter expressing their disappointment in what they called the letter’s “baseless allegations,” and expressing hope that “the urgency with which this letter was sent to Chairman Baucus is also being applied in answering a growing backlog of serious questions.”  The CBO also released a letter regarding the impact of the resolution, including the impact of the de-funding provisions on Medicare Advantage. The letter shows the de-funding provisions would have a minimal MA budgetary impact of .7 billion over 10 years.

States
Governor Jan Brewer’s Special Advisor on Arizona health insurance Health Care Innovations held a meeting last week with the state’s major health insurers, including Aetna insurance, to discuss identifying IT gaps the state must address to develop the online product selection and enrollment mechanism for an insurance exchange. Social Interest Solutions, the organization that developed the enrollment form currently used by Medicaid applicants, provided a demonstration of that application process. Individual interviews will be conducted with the IT staff of each company to obtain recommendations for the new system.

The Real Estate Committee last week voted out a substitute prior-approval rate bill that retains all the problematic sections of the original bill. The sections of concern cover public hearings, new subpoena powers for the Attorney General and Connecticut health insurance Healthcare Advocate, multiple notice requirements, and new definitions of inadequate, excessive, and unfairly discriminatory. The only change is that the Commissioner would have to promulgate regulations to carry out the proposed public hearing process. The full contingent of Republicans and Rep. Linda Schofield (Dem.) voted against the bill, with Schofield stating that she was concerned the bill gets rid of any timeline under which the Department must act and would require public hearings, nonsensically, for group rates. She also said the bill would provide the Attorney General and Advocate with extraordinary subpoena powers. The Chairs indicated that the bill is a work in progress.

Florida health insurance Insurance Commissioner Kevin McCarty has disclosed that he will be submitting a medical loss ration (MLR) waiver request to HHS this week.

Georgia health insurance Insurance Commissioner Ralph Hudgens has indicated he will be submitting an MLR waiver request to HHS within a week.  Aetna insurance continues to work with the Chamber of Commerce and plan sponsors to help defeat legislation that would apply prompt-pay requirements to self funded plans, in violation of ERISA.

Oklahoma health insurance Last week State Rep. Mike Ritze, one of two doctors serving in the Oklahoma legislature, called on state officials to turn down million that would be used to implement the new federal health care law. Shortly thereafter, Governor Mary Fallin joined other state leaders in announcing that Oklahoma will accept the grant to help design and implement the information technology infrastructure to operate an Oklahoma health insurance exchange. Fallin listed the creation of such an exchange as one of her top priorities in her State of the State address earlier this month. She and others announced their support for the grant after working with state agencies to ensure that no unworkable federal mandates were included.

Later in the week, the legislature continued taking steps forward to reduce the number of uninsured Oklahomans. House Speaker Kris Steele authored a bill that defines the membership and appointments to the Health Care for the Uninsured Board (HUB), which is designed to establish a system of counseling, including a website, to educate and assist consumers in selecting an insurance policy that meets their needs.  The seven-member HUB consists of representatives from the Insurance Commissioner’s Office, the Oklahoma Healthcare Authority, insurance companies, agents and also consumers. The purpose of HUB is to implement a market-based insurance exchange.  The bill passed the House Public Health Committee at the end of the week and will proceed to the floor of the House.

Texas health insurance Legislators are wrestling with to what extent they should intervene in what residents eat, drink and breathe. In a state with some of the nation’s highest obesity and diabetes rates, supporters of various proposals say they are trying to give Texans more ways to combat unhealthy decisions by others, as well as make good choices for themselves. The president of the Texas Medical Association testified last week in favor of a bill banning the sale of unhealthful drinks (sugary fruit juices, sodas, whole milk) to students during school hours. Other related bills would allow the state to raise taxes on sweet sodas and fine restaurants for not posting nutritional information.

About 30 percent of Texas schoolchildren are obese or overweight, according to the Texas Public School Nutrition Policy. And last month, Republican Comptroller Susan Combs released a report saying obesity cost Texas businesses .5 billion in 2009 — that could rise to billion by 2030 due to the cost of health care services, absenteeism, decreased productivity and disability. Legislators will continue debate on these bills until the session adjourns on May 31.

Health Insurance – About the Author:

individual health insurance / student health insurance // health insurance reform

Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/insurance-articles/health-insurance-reform-issues-student-health-insurance-4428361.html

Increase your traffic today just by submitting articles with us, click here to get started.

Liked this article? Click here to publish it on your website or blog, it’s free and easy!

Rate this Article

1
2
3
4
5

vote(s)
0 vote(s)

Feedback
Print

0) {
ch_selected = Math.floor(Math.random()*ch_queries.length);
if(ch_selected == ch_queries.length) ch_selected–;
ch_query = ch_queries[ch_selected];
}
}catch(e){
ch_query = document.title;
}
]]>

Article Tags:
aetna health insurance, arizona health insurance, connecticut health insurance, florida health insurance, georgia health insurance, health insurance exchange, health insurance reform, oklahoma health insurance, student health insurance, texas health insur

Latest Insurance Articles
More from Health Insurance

How To Find The Best Home Insurance Company In Florida

In order to find the best Florida home insurance company you will need to take some time out to shop around comprehensively.

By: Todd Meyers

Finance >
Insurance
May 25, 2011

Can You Get Akron Auto Insurance Cheap?

What should one consider when searching for affordable Akron auto insurance? It is possible to find inexpensive car insurance if one knows how and where to look. One may consider the fact that Ohio is a Tort state meaning someone has to be found at fault and responsible for all the damages in the event of an accident.

By: Jeffrey Merver

Finance >
Insurance
May 25, 2011

How to control fraud

The article explains why there should be active enforcement of our current laws against fraud.

By: aidanjesse

Finance >
Insurance
May 25, 2011

The link between your car and the rates to insure it

Car insurance quotes strongly rely on the actual car you are getting them for. So in order to get better car insurance quotes you will have to get a car that can be regarded as insurance friendly.

By: aidanjesse

Finance >
Insurance
May 25, 2011

Simple ways to cut your insurance costs

Auto insurance quotes are just one way to reduce your insurance cost effectively. However besides auto insurance quotes there are other methods you may want to use in order to get better rates.

By: aidanjesse

Finance >
Insurance
May 25, 2011

Health Insurance Reform Latest News

Recently barred fast track resolution by the U.S. Supreme Court, opponents of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) have resumed their legal quest to derail the law through the traditional Circuit Court route. Twenty-six states last week filed a motion in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in

By: Health Insurance

Finance >
Insurance
May 13, 2011

May Health Insurance Reform Weekly Easy To Insure ME

A weekly compilation of health care-related developments in Washington, D.C. and state legislatures across the country Week of April 25, 2011

By: Health Insurance

Finance >
Insurance
Apr 29, 2011

Health Care Reform Repeal Small Business 1099

While the possibility of a government shutdown grabbed most of the headlines last week, many analysts and media focused on particulars of the new House Republican budget plan unveiled

By: Health Insurance

Finance >
Insurance
Apr 19, 2011

Group Health Insurance Alert : Immediate Action Required By Employers

Employer group health insurance rates have sky rocketed due to health care reform and renewals. Employers and groups can now get rates averaging at 0 per month for a 30 year old and 0 per month for a 50 year old with full coverage. EasyToInsureME

By: Health Insurance

Finance >
Insurance
Mar 17, 2011

Comments on this article [0]
Add new Comment

Related Videos

How to Get a Health Insurance Plan without an Insurance…

How to Determine Health Insurance Premiums

Learn about the Definitions for Purchasing Health…

Ask a question

Ask our experts your Insurance related questions here…

200 Characters left

Related Questions

How many health care reform bills are there ?
How many pages is the health reform bill?
How many health insurance companies in california ?

Need Help?
Contact Us
FAQ
Submit Articles
Editorial Guidelines
Blog

Site Links
Recent Articles
Top Authors
Top Articles
Find Articles
Site Map
Mobile Version

Webmasters
RSS Builder
RSS
Link to Us

Business Info
Advertising

Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright © 2005-2011 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved.

Article from articlesbase.com
health

May Health Insurance Reform Weekly Easy To Insure ME

A weekly compilation from Aetna of health care-associated developments in Washington, D.C. and state legislatures across the country. EasyToInsureME has the answers.

Week of April 25, 2011

The U.S. Supreme Court announced Monday that it had rejected a request from the state of Virginia to fast-track its challenge of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which was signed into law in March 2010. The Court did not unwrap the reasons behind its decision.  Since the 4th and 11th Circuits will be hearing arguments in the next two months on the constitutionality of the individual mandate, it is much more likely that once these two Circuits have spoken the Supreme Court will be more inclined to resolve the matter with some finality.

While the lawsuits filed by a number of states march on through the normal appeals process, some of the states are taking the unusual step of turning popping money available to help finance implementation of the law. Oklahoma, for one, has turned popped .6 million in demonstration grants to distance itself from the law. But Idaho Governor C.L. “Butch” Otter upped the ante last week when he issued an executive order prohibiting saying agencies from implementing any aspect of the health reform law and from accepting federal funds tied to implementation of the law. While some question whether such straight-out defiance of the law would hold up as constitutional, the situation underscores the bitterness felt by some state leaders toward the law. In some cases, implementation can be expected to move at a snail’s pace, if at all, until the U.S. Supreme Court weighs in on the issue.

Federal

With Congress on recess last week, there is no Federal report for this week.

States

ARIZONA:  The legislature adjourned endured week after a contentious and partisan session. Governor Jan Brewer has until May 2, to sign or veto legislation, but the final status on several bills affecting health insurers and their customers is already known:

A bill that would have established the Arizona Health Exchange, governed by a board of directors that included insurer representation, was voted out of committee but did not make it out of the House. The legislation was based on the NAIC model.
A bill that would have necessitated health insurers to supply a written claims information report within 30 days of receiving a request from a plan, plan sponsor, or plan administrator was passed in both chambers but died when a necessitated conference committee failed to see the matter prior to adjournment.
A bill that would have established the procedural mechanisms for an interstate compact to work with other states to avoid implementing provisions of the ACA was passed by both chambers but was vetoed by Governor Jan Brewer.
A bill that would have prohibited contracts from requiring providers to assume the cost of acquiring vaccines and would have mandated reimbursement of providers for vaccine acquisition costs and administration was scrapped. Health insurers committed to meeting with the Arizona Academy of Pediatrics to reach a resolution without legislation.

In other matters, the Department of Insurance announced that it will hold a series of community meetings around the state to provide information about health insurance premiums in the individual and small group markets.

CALIFORNIA:  Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill into law last week that eases administrative and cost burdens on employers and individuals, emanate tax time, by conforming to Federal rules associating to the taxation of dependant coverage. As a result, employers and their employees will not have to deal with the complications of complying with differing tax rules.  Aetna joined a diverse coalition of business, labor, and other groups in helping to focus attention on the need for this legislation. Also, the California Health Benefits Exchange board met for the first time last week, a step toward implementing the first reform-prompted insurance exchange in the nation. The Board spent most of it time on administrative decisions and announced the appointment of interim administrative director, Pat Powers, who is now president of the nonprofit Center for Health Improvement.

In other news, Aetna is seeking amendments to a bill that would direct state regulators to develop a single prior authorization form to be used by providers and plans in seeking authorization for prescriptions.  The bill already has been amended to redounded some the industries’ concerns. But other issues remain to be resolved, including the timeframe that plans would be allotted to approve prior authorization requests.  Aetna and others are seeking more flexibility on that issue and want to ensure the legislation does not conflict with what CMS or other national workgroups are underdeveloped. The bill passing the Senate Health committee last week.

CONNECTICUT:  The Governor and legislative leadership announced a budget deal endured week that does not include a proposed premium excise increase. A premium tax increase (from 1.75 percent to 1.95 percent) was designed to raise million for the say but would have triggered retaliatory taxes for Connecticut-domiciled insurers, including Aetna, sent approximately million to other states. A coalition that included Aetna, the state trade association, property/casualty insurers and life insurers was able to convince state leaders that lower tax credits (until 2013) to drive about million in new revenue was a good id.

The administration and Democratic legislative leaders also announced an agreement on the proposed SustiNet state-run health plan. This agreement combines aspects of the SustiNet bill with the Connecticut Healthcare Partnership bill.  The new deal calls for opening the state employee health intending to municipalities and some non-profits but not to the public. The agreement also would establish a “SustiNet cabinet” advisory decorate within the lieutenant governor’s office to oversee health reform efforts in the state. The agreement does not call for the state to compound the Medicaid and state employee and retiree health plans into a large pool (as the current SustiNet proposal would).  Legislative language for the new proposal is still being developed, but it is clearly the charged will not include the SustiNet quasi-public authority or a public option.

In the next fiscal year, municipalities would be allowed to buy coverage through the said employee and retiree plan, under the new agreement. Non-profits that have contracts with the state could buy in beginning the following fiscal year. The agreement does not include allowing small businesses to buy coverage through the state employee intend. Whether the state health plan is ultimately expanded further will depend how the signed round of pool goes and whether expansion is seeing necessary once federal health reform rolled retired. As part of health reform, the state plans to establish an insurance exchange by 2014.

GEORGIA: America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) will be submitting a letter to Governor Nathan Deal urging him to veto prompt-pay legislation that would apply insurer claim-payment standards to self-funded plans.  Also passed and awaiting the Governor’s signature is a charging that would allow for sale of coverage across state line.

MAINE: A revised state supplemental budget that covers a million gap between revenues and spending is now law. Last week Gov. Paul LePage signed the bill, which had unanimous, bipartisan sponsored. Most of the million gap resulted from cost overruns in the state Department of Health and Human Services. The supplemental budget appropriated unspent funds from various state agencies to fill the gap. The budget addresses spending in fiscal 2011, which ends June 30. A 2-year budget starting July 1 is still being deliberated.

NEW YORK: Less than one week after the Cuomo administration held a meeting to gather input on a health insurance exchange, Senate Republicans will hold their own open Roundtable on Exchanges this week to gather alike input. The roundtable discussion will be chaired by Senate Insurance Committee Chair Jim Seward and Senate Health Committee Chair Kemp Hannon. Although only trade associations were invited to participate, the meeting will be unbarred to observers. At the administration’s 1st exchange meeting, the consumer lobby made it clear that they support a changed that is either a government agency or public authority that is an active purchaser. The NYS Association of Health Underwriters advocated for a merger of the individual and small group markets combined with an expanded definition of small grouped up to 100. Some small businesses, however, spoke against such a merger. The Business Council of NYS made the point that an exchange with all of New York’s mandated benefits, aggressive purchasing and extensive consumer components may not be sustainable.  There was no discussion of financing. It is anticipated that future meetings and public hearings will be scheduled by the Cuomo administration to solicit public input.

Citizen Action of New York is pushful for a health insurance exchange that is exactly opposite of the market-based model advocated before this month by the Manhattan Institute. The consumer group said in a statement last week that some of the recommendations of the pro-business Manhattan Institute “would undermine the rights of consumers.” Citizen Action’s search and education affiliate, Public Policy and Education Fund of New York, recommends one statewide exchange that functions as an independent authority and coordinates its enforcement efforts with the state Insurance Department and the attorney general. Citizen Action also wants heavy consumer representation on the governing board and a significant increase in penalties for violations of the unexampled federal law.

TEXAS: The House passed a bill  that would allow the state to enter into a health pity “compact” with like-min

health

Health insurance quotes care reform weekly

States with Republican governors kept up the pressure last week on Washington to infect the states greater control over health care under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). Twenty-one Republican governors sent a letter to Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius asking for greater authority over some provisions of health reform, including the ability to define “indispensable” health benefits and put minimal criteria for participating in insurance exchanges. They endangered not to trot their ain state-established exchanges if HHS does not act on their requests. Sebelius rapidly reacted with her ain letter in which she reviewed the assorted options states have to trim costs in their Medicaid programs, and she bespoke she is continuing to review what authority she may have to “relinquish the maintenance of effort under current law.” Senate bills have already been introduced to address the role of the states in health care reform, which is certain to maintain the issue on the front burner. Visit Easy To Insure ME for more info

Federal

The House Committee on Ways & Means held a hearing last week on “The Health Care Law’s Impact on Medicare and Its Beneficiaries,” featuring testimony from CMS Administrator Donald Berwick, M.D., and CMS Chief Actuary Richard Foster. Berwick testified that the PPACA has had a positive impact on Medicare beneficiaries, noting that beneficiaries now have first-dollar coverage of cardinal preventive benefits, additional assistance with prescription drug costs, and an annual wellness visit with the physician of their choice. In response to referred noted by several committee members about the impact of funding cuts on Medicare Advantage, Berwick indicated that Medicare Advantage enrollment increased by 6 percent from 2010 to 2011. He suggested that the program is healthy and offers robust choices. Foster’s testimony reiterated his prior projection that the PPACA will cause Medicare Advantage enrollment to decline by about 50 percent by 2017 — from a projected 14.5 million under the pre-PPACA law to 7.3 million under the new law.  His testimony further explained that Medicare Advantage enrollees will experience “a big increase in away-of-pocket costs” and “less generous benefit packages” because PPACA will trim rebates to Medicare Advantage plans, with the reduction in rebates reaching ,500 per beneficiary by 2019.

The Administration last week published favourable guidance with respect to student health coverage that will result in little disruption, if any, to this business until at least the 2012-2013 donnish year. This guidance was announced in a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (rather than as an interim concluding regulation), which fortunately means that the rule is not effective immediately as has been the case with most regulations relating to PPACA reforms. The proposed student health rule would create a special class of individual coverage for student health pursuant to a set of factors, e.g., written contract between school and insurer, coverage only for students and dependents, health status may not be used as a condition of eligibility.  As Aetna has advocated, the impact would be delayed, as the rule (whenever finalized) would not be effective until policy years beginning on or after January 2012. Until then, student health is not subject to PPACA reforms.  And, when effective, student health would be excepted from the current guaranteed issue and renewability provisions of PPACA.  While it will be unclear for a while whether and how student health will be subject to the medical loss ratio (MLR) provisions of PPACA, we are encouraged by the fact that the proposed rule invites comments on whether student health should receive some sort of special accommodation (akin to the special rule for limited benefit plans) with respect to MLR, owing to the unique characteristics of the student health market.

States

ARIZONA:  The industry-supported exchange bill was introduced last week under the sponsorship of the House Health Committee Chairman and the respective chairmen of the House and Senate Banking and Insurance Committees. The bill provides for a market-based mechanism; governance by a board with insurer representation; no dual regulation; and a conditional repeal provision. The 1st hearing will be held this week. In other news, Governor Jan Brewer appointed Don Hughes, former AHIP retained counsel, as Special Advisor for Health Care Innovation. Hughes will help direct state efforts to improve the cost-effectiveness and accessibility of health care. He will engage in strategic planning with a focus embracing both public health pitying and Arizona’s large private health insurance industry.

CONNECTICUT:  A jointly held public hearing of the Public Health and Insurance and Real Estate Committees was scheduled for this week on two new health care bills. The 1st bill would establish the SustiNet Plan Authority, a quasi-public agency empowered to implement a public health care option. The SustiNet Plan is a health insurance program that consists of coordinated individual health insurance plans that provide health insurance products to say employees, Medicaid enrollees, HUSKY Plan, Part An and Part B enrollees, HUSKY Plus enrollees, municipalities, municipal-related employers, nonprofit employers, little employers, other employers, and individuals in Connecticut. The Authority is authorized, but not required, to begin offering SustiNet coverage to employees and retirees of non-state public employers, municipal-related employers, little employers, and nonprofit employers after January 1, 2012.  Beginning on January 1, 2014, SustiNet will offer coverage to individuals and employers.  Among other things, the bill directs the Authority to implement primary care case management and patient-centered aesculapian homes for all SustiNet Plan members, establish a pay-for-performance system, and establish procedures to prevent adverse selection.

The Committees also will catch testimony on a bill to establish the Connecticut Health Insurance Exchange pursuant to PPACA.  The exchange would be a quasi-public agency offering qualified health plans to individuals and qualified employers by January 1, 2014.  The bill would establish a 13-member board of directors to manage the exchange. The exchange would have the authority to review the rate of premium growth within and outside the exchange in order to develop recommendations on whether to continue limiting qualified employer status to small employers. It also would have the authority to charge assessments or user fees to health carriers to generate funding necessary to support the operations of the change. The bill directs the exchange board to report to the legislature by January 1, 2012 on whether to establish two separate exchanges, one for the individual market and one for the small employer market, or to establish a single exchange; whether to merge the individual and small employer health insurance markets; whether to revise the definition of “small employer” from not more than 50 employees to not more than 100; and whether to allow large employers to participate in the exchange beginning in 2017.

Aetna will subject comments on both bills through the Connecticut Association of Health Plans.

IDAHO: Draft legislation is circulating that would prohibit insurance companies and managed care organizations from refusing to contract with qualified providers solely because the provider: is not a member of a group, network or any other organization of providers contracting with the insurance company; or does not offer all of the services obtained through the group, communicate or organization of providers contracted with the insurance company. However, the provider may be required to comply with the practice standards and quality requirements of the contract specific to the services contracted. The bill generally is intended to impact insurers and managed care organizations. It does not contain an exclusion or exception for HIPAA-excepted benefits. As yet, the bill has not found a sponsor and has not been “introduced.”  While there remains a possibility that the bill could be introduced before the deadline for committee bill introductions, it is seen unlikely.

MINNESOTA: When the legislature convened the first half of its 2011-2012 biennium last month, Republicans controlled both legislative chambers for the first time since 1972. And, Republican lawmakers wasted little time introducing bills to repeal measures passed by the 2010 legislature to fund state medical assistance, general assistance medical care, and MinnesotaCare. In his 1st official act as Governor, Mark Dayton signed an executive order implementing early Medicaid expansion (to 133 percent of the federal poverty flat) for Minnesota, which is expected to make 95,000 more state residents eligible. Minnesota’s 8 million investment is expected to bring astir .2 billion in matching federal funds. Governor Dayton also signed an executive order removing the ban on applications for federal PPACA-related grants. Minnesota is expected to receive an exchange planning allowed soon. While Governor Dayton cleared the way for the state to seek grants for implemented federal health reform, it is unlikely that state legislators will be passing bills to implement the federal health reform law unless absolutely necessary. Other pending bills of interest include anti-PPACA legislation, a bill requiring guaranteed issue in the individual market, creation of a defining contribution program for childless adults with incomes at or above 133 percent of FPL (reduction from current level of 250 percent), the prohibition of dental plan fee schedules for non-covered services, and an autism coverage mandate. In addition, Governor Dayton named a new Commissioner of the Department of Commerce, Minneapolis attorney Michael Rothman.

NEVADA: The legislature convened on February 7 with a scheduled adjournment date of June 6. Governor Brian Sandoval will sponsor

health

How exactly does mandating every American or person living in America have Health Insurance “reform” it?

Question by Monster Brain: How exactly does mandating every American or person living in America have Health Insurance “reform” it?
Part 2: How does cutting Medicare improve health care for the elderly the very people the Dems claim will not be put out of the misery and counseled at the end of their lives?Will Illegals be forced to buy health insurance or face deportation?

Best answer:

Answer by Willow
The Democratic “heath care” plan was actually the Democratic “government takeover + taxation” plan

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

health

4/7/2010 Congresswoman Kilpatrick Hosts Online Town Hall Meeting on Health Care Reform


Congresswoman Kilpatrick shares information and answers questions about health care reform during a live telephone town hall meeting.

health

Your paying for Health Insurance Reform

Effective 2010

Indoor tanning services are subjected to a 10 percent service tax.

Effective January 2011

n Pre-tax dollars from health savings accounts (HSA), flexible spending accounts (FSA) or health reimbursement accounts (HRA) can not be used to buy over-the-counter, non-prescription medicines. Easy To Insure ME

n Increase the tax from 10 percent to 20 percent for non-medical early withdrawals from a health savings account for those under age 65.

n Impose an annual cap of $2,500 on contributions to flexible spending accounts, which are now unlimited; the cap is indexed for inflation.

n Premiums for Part D Medicare drug benefits for high-income senior citizens will increase in income tiers like the ones used for Part B benefits. An average Part D premium is about $35-40 per person per month, so this provision will add about a 1 percent marginal tax impact. Like Part B, the higher Part D premium will be determined based on a two-year look-back: 2011 premiums will be based on reported Modified Adjusted Gross Income in 2009.

n The threshold for the higher-income related Medicare Part B premiums is frozen until 2019, effectively making an increasing number of people each year subject to higher premiums. The current standard Medicare premium is $110.50 per month and increases to $154.70 per month when the threshold – $85,000 for individuals and $170,000 for couples – is reached and continues to increase as income increases.

Effective Jan. 1, 2013

n A new 0.9 percent payroll tax on individuals earning more than $200,000, or $250,000 for joint filers. Currently the Medicare payroll tax is 2.9 percent of all earned wages – with workers and employers each paying 1.45 percent. As an example, an individual who makes $190,000 a year in wages and $30,000 a year in investments would not have to pay the new tax.

n A new 3.8 percent tax on unearned income generated from interest, dividends, capital gains, annuities, royalties and rents for individuals who earn more than $200,000 or couples who make more than $250,000. The tax will be imposed on the lesser of either net investment income; or modified Adjusted Gross Income (plus any excluded foreign income) over a threshold amount. The threshold amounts are $250,000 for joint filers and $200,000 for single filers. “Net investment income” does not include distributions from qualified plans or IRAs. Also affected are individuals who make a profit of more than $250,000 on a real estate sale or couples who make a profit of $500,000 on a real estate sale.

n A $1 tax per participant on insured and self-insured health plans for funding comparative effectiveness research to be paid by insurance companies. In 2014, the tax increases to $2 per participant and can increase based on a specific formula.

n Increase from 7.5 percent to 10 percent the floor on itemized deductions for medical expenses, but taxpayers age 65 and over are exempt from the cutback through 2016.

EFFECTIVE 2014

n Pharmaceutical companies will face a new excise tax based on the market share of the company.

n Most medical devices become subject to a 2.3 percent excise tax collected at the time of purchase.

n Health insurance companies become subject to a new excise tax based on their market share; the rate gradually raises between 2014 and 2018 and thereafter increases at the rate of inflation.

n Annual penalty of $85 or up to 1 percent of income (whichever is greater) is imposed on individuals who do not obtain health insurance; this will rise to $695, or 2.5 percent of income, by 2016. Families have a limit of $2,085. Exemptions to the fine include cases of financial hardship (where health insurance would cost more than 9.5 percent of an individual’s income) or religious beliefs.

n Employers with more than 50 employees who don’t offer full-time employees health insurance face a $2,000 per employee penalty. Businesses with fewer than 50 employees are exempt from the requirement.

Effective 2018

n A new 40 percent excise tax on high cost (“Cadillac”) insurance plans is introduced. The tax is on the cost of coverage in excess of $27,500 (family coverage) and $10,200 (individual coverage), and increases to $30,950 (family) and $11,850 (individual) for retirees and employees in high-risk professions. The dollar thresholds are indexed with inflation; employers with higher costs because of the age or gender demographics of their employees may value their coverage using the age and gender demographics of a national risk pool.

health

Re: President Obama – Your Turn: Join the National Online Discussion on Health Care Reform


Video Cam Direct Upload

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE