Is “Bad Sex” Better Than “No Sex” ?

Question by BRAINY SKEETA ®: Is “Bad Sex” Better Than “No Sex” ?
Is No Sex Better?

Best answer:

Answer by Taha*
Yes*

Add your own answer in the comments!

17 Comments

  • Ashleigh S
    December 22, 2010 - 6:11 am | Permalink

    no

  • Erato
    December 22, 2010 - 6:45 am | Permalink

    No.

    At least with no sex, you can pleasure yourself.

    : )

  • puppysyndrome
    December 22, 2010 - 7:29 am | Permalink

    I`d go without!

  • ~*~Dr Dawna McLuscious~*~
    December 22, 2010 - 7:41 am | Permalink

    Masturbation is better than both.
    “If he can’t do it right, do it yourself and tell him what he missed”

  • Boo ya
    December 22, 2010 - 8:35 am | Permalink

    Bad sex is better than no sex when you’re legal.

  • Lorraine [Vampy's Girl]
    December 22, 2010 - 8:44 am | Permalink

    It depends. My boyfriend thinks that really quick bad sex is better than no sex, but I think bad sex is just like no sex cause I really don’t enjoy it. I like to take time and do lots of stuff so for me quick sex = bad sex.

  • Carissa B
    December 22, 2010 - 8:52 am | Permalink

    Yep. At least you’re gettin’ some!

  • freckles2
    December 22, 2010 - 9:40 am | Permalink

    I would rather have no sex.
    Getting all worked up and then getting bad sex. No thanx. I would rather do it myself!

  • cowboydoc
    December 22, 2010 - 10:26 am | Permalink

    Absolutely “NO” I have always believed the prologue to the act is the ultimate in experiences, the Foreplay, it is the best part and stimulates to the ‘nth limits. To keep the emotions on edge for two hours with foreplay and then the ultimate, is never forgotten.

  • lissts
    December 22, 2010 - 10:32 am | Permalink

    Nope No sex is great.

    No STD, No check ups

    No pregnancy

    No child support

  • cryingisblackmail
    December 22, 2010 - 10:43 am | Permalink

    Yes,
    keeping the “equipment” in use is always a form of gaining more experience for when you do get “good” sex

  • skippy
    December 22, 2010 - 11:14 am | Permalink

    no…….. i would rather go with out.it is hard to maintain the blood flow if it is bad and i prefer to enjoy it ,,correct me if i am wrong but i thought sex was meant to be fun

  • Candice™
    December 22, 2010 - 11:19 am | Permalink

    Sometimes any type of sex is better then none, then again depends on who ur having sex with LOL ?

  • lord_zedd16
    December 22, 2010 - 11:42 am | Permalink

    Speaking as a person with no sex, I say yes.

  • Farouz A
    December 22, 2010 - 11:44 am | Permalink

    what is the meaning of this question?

  • cursedsoal
    December 22, 2010 - 12:22 pm | Permalink

    well its only bad sex if you don’t tell them what works and what doesn’t.

  • merton.moonsilver
    December 22, 2010 - 1:05 pm | Permalink

    Hi Rita!

    No definately not. Bad sex is bad for both partners. It damages self-esteem, encourages poor “sexual etiquette” and demeans the purpose of the act itself. Masterbation is better than bad sex.

    Sex is supposed to be a pleasureable experience for both partners, a biological physical release. The act of sex releases endorphins (neurological chemicals) which allows for a bonding and cementing of a relationship and provides health benefits too. This is over and above the procreational aspects of sex.

    Bad sex can actually cause emotional distress and damage both partner’s future relationships, introduce sexually transmitted diseases and lead to unwanted pregnancy.

    Nessie x

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *


    *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    Powered by Yahoo! Answers

    Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE